From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luu v. Sisto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S 08-2630 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S 08-2630 JAM CKD P

09-20-2011

QUOC XUONG LUU, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al. Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 15, 2011, respondents filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days petitioner file an opposition to respondents' pending motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

de

luu2630.146


Summaries of

Luu v. Sisto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S 08-2630 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Luu v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:QUOC XUONG LUU, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al. Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S 08-2630 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)