From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LUU v. SINGH

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2783 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2783 LKK DAD P.

February 3, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, currently confined at Solano County Jail, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 9, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 9, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's October 6, 2009 application for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations; and

3. This action is closed.


Summaries of

LUU v. SINGH

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2783 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2010)
Case details for

LUU v. SINGH

Case Details

Full title:QUOC XUONG LUU, Petitioner, v. V. SINGH, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2783 LKK DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2010)