Opinion
CASE NO. CV11-02133 EJD
10-06-2011
VANNESSA LUU, Plaintiff(s), v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant(s).
William H. Thomas Attorney for Plaintiff Vannessa Luu Heather M. Sager Attorney for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more lilzely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Locail Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ____
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) February 1, 2012 (to account for holiday schedules that might adversely
[×] other requested deadline impact scheduling in late-2011
William H. Thomas
Attorney for Plaintiff
Vannessa Luu
Heather M. Sager
Attorney for Defendant
Hewlett-Packard Company
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
[] Non-binding Arbitration
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[X] Mediation
[] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[] 90 days from the date of this order,
[×] other February 1, 2012
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE