From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lutz v. Valenzuela

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 3, 2013
CV 11-104-CBM (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2013)

Opinion


GARY M. LUTZ, Plaintiff, v. VALENZUELA, et al., Defendants. No. CV 11-104-CBM (PJW) United States District Court, C.D. California. October 3, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation and the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge and has considered de novo the portions of the Report to which objections have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.


Summaries of

Lutz v. Valenzuela

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 3, 2013
CV 11-104-CBM (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Lutz v. Valenzuela

Case Details

Full title:GARY M. LUTZ, Plaintiff, v. VALENZUELA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 3, 2013

Citations

CV 11-104-CBM (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Blocker v. Solis

See, e.g., Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1208 (9th Cir. 2012) (district court is not required to consider…