From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luster v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Sep 29, 2010
Civil Action No. 5:03-CR-52 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5:03-CR-52 (HL) 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

September 29, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is the report and recommendation (Doc. 85) entered on April 13, 2010 of United States Magistrate Judge G. Mallon Faircloth, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that Petitioner's Motion for Relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure rule 60(b)(5) (Doc. 82) be denied as moot, as frivolous, and for failure to state a claim.

The Petitioner has filed a response to the recommendation (Doc. 89) as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The response, however, was filed over three months late. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the objection and made a de novo review of the portions of the recommendation to which Plaintiff objects.

After careful consideration, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgement (Doc. 82) is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Luster v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Sep 29, 2010
Civil Action No. 5:03-CR-52 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Luster v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ANTOINE LUSTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Sep 29, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 5:03-CR-52 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 29, 2010)