From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luster v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 15, 2019
CASE NO. 5:03-cr-00100-TES-CHW-1 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 15, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:03-cr-00105-TES-CHW-1

11-15-2019

DAVID ANTOINE LUSTER, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

After a de novo review of the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 72] issued by the United States Magistrate Judge on October 29, 2019, is hereby ADOPTED and MADE ORDER OF THE COURT. 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court considered Movant's Objection [Doc. 73] and finds that it lacks merit. Movant's Motions to Arrest Judgment [Docs. 69, 70] substantively constitute second or successive collateral attacks of his convictions. Since Movant did not seek authorization from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and DISMISSES his Motions.

SO ORDERED, this 15th day of November, 2019.

S/ Tilman E. Self, III

TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Luster v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Nov 15, 2019
CASE NO. 5:03-cr-00100-TES-CHW-1 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Luster v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ANTOINE LUSTER, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 5:03-cr-00100-TES-CHW-1 (M.D. Ga. Nov. 15, 2019)