From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lusk v. State

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Mar 20, 2014
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00039-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2014)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 12-14-00039-CR

03-20-2014

DANNY RAY LUSK, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


APPEALED FROM 173RD DISTRICT COURT


IN AND FOR


HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS


ORDER

Came on for consideration the Appellant's Pro Se Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in the above-referenced cause, and it appearing that Appellant's counsel has filed an Andersbrief herein and that Appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that Appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before April 21, 2014, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to Appellant. Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court.

WITNESS THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals District, Tyler, Texas.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at Tyler, Texas, this 20th day of March 2014, A.D.

Respectfully yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: __________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Lusk v. State

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Mar 20, 2014
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00039-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Lusk v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANNY RAY LUSK, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Date published: Mar 20, 2014

Citations

CAUSE NO. 12-14-00039-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2014)