From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lusik v. Saurers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2011
No-11-1560 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No-11-1560

08-30-2011

DAVID LUSIK, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DEBRA K. SAURERS. et al., Respondents


CIVIL ACTION

ORDER

, J.

AND NOW, this 29 day of August, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDER that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. The praecipe and motion for judicial notice (doc. 2) is DENIED.

4. The praecipe (doc. 5) is DENIED.

5. The motion for evidentiary hearing (doc. 6) is DENIED.

6. The motion for preliminary injunction (doc. 7) is DENIED.

7. The motion to supplement complaint (doc. 10) is DENIED.

8. The motion for judicial notice (doc. 16) is DENIED.

9. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

10. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

BERLE M. SCHILLER, J.


Summaries of

Lusik v. Saurers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2011
No-11-1560 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Lusik v. Saurers

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LUSIK, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DEBRA K. SAURERS. et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

No-11-1560 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2011)