Luscomb v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. D.F. v. State

    721 So. 2d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

    We affirm appellant's conviction for petit theft of money from Wendy's restaurant, appellant's place of employment. Appellant's statements to his coworker, Jessica Tirone, distinguish this case from Luscomb v. State, 660 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Appellant's statements established that he was actively searching for money shortly before the theft was discovered and that he asked Tirone to take money from her cash register. A short time later, appellant showed off a wad of cash. Tirone testified that she "had a clue that the back register would have come out short" because appellant was "trying to get the girl's attention.

  2. C.N. v. State

    684 So. 2d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 1 times
    Applying the rule of State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1989), to delinquency cases

    We reverse because the State failed to present evidence that was inconsistent with his reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1989); Luscomb v. State, 660 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); J.C.S. v. State, 613 So.2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). REVERSED.