Opinion
No. 1:13-cv-1650-CL
03-14-2014
ORDER
PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).
After reviewing the file, I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that plaintiff cannot state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I also agree that this court should decline to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining claims, which are under state law.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#17) is adopted. Defendants' motion to dismiss (#6) is granted with prejudice as to plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and without prejudice and leave to refile in state court as to plaintiff's remaining claims under state law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE