From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luque v. AT&T Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB)(JCS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB)(JCS)

10-04-2011

JOE LEWIS LUQUE AND HERMAN RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. AT&T CORP., PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. d/b/a AT&T CALIFORNIA, AND AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendants.

Counsel for Plaintiffs: JANETTE WIPPER (Cal. State Bar No. 275264) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635) SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805) KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760) RAM & OLSON LLP EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915) LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK Counsel for Defendants: J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838) JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP


(Counsel listed on following pages)

[PROPOSED] AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

Counsel for Plaintiffs:

JANETTE WIPPER (Cal. State Bar No. 275264)

SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP

STEVEN L. WITTELS (N.Y. State Bar No. 2004635)

SANFORD WITTELS & HEISLER, LLP

MICHAEL RAM (Cal. State Bar No. 104805)

KARL OLSON (Cal. State Bar No. 104760)

RAM & OLSON LLP

EDMOND CLARK (Conn. State Bar No. 418915)

LAW OFFICE OF EDMOND CLARK

Counsel for Defendants:

J. AL LATHAM, JR. (Cal. State Bar No. 071605)

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 096838)

JEFFREY P. MICHALOWSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 248073)

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

WILLIAM CORY BARKER (Georgia State Bar No. 037727)

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

On the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Scheduling Order (Docket No. 147) is hereby amended, and that the following is adopted as the Court's scheduling order in this action:

1. Production of time-stamped electronic data responsive to discovery requests to be completed by November 21, 2011.

2. Plaintiffs' expert disclosures to be completed by December 21, 2011

3. Defendants' expert disclosures to be completed by January 18, 2012

4. Expert rebuttal reports to be completed by February 6, 2012

5. Non-expert class certification fact discovery and expert discovery to be concluded by February 16, 2012.

6. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to be filed by March 15, 2012

7. Defendants' opposition to plaintiffs' motion for class certification to be filed by April 12, 2012.

8. Plaintiffs' reply brief in support of their motion for class certification to be filed by May 9, 2012.

9. A further scheduling conference to be set by the Court for a date that is at least 30 days after the Court rules on plaintiffs' motion for class certification.

Charls R. Breyer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Luque v. AT&T Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB)(JCS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Luque v. AT&T Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOE LEWIS LUQUE AND HERMAN RICHARDSON, Individually and On Behalf of All…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

No. 3:09CV5885 (CRB)(JCS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)