Opinion
Argued May 21, 1937 —
Decided September 22, 1937.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 117 N.J.L. 342.
For the appellants, Joseph T. Lieblich.
For the respondent, Arthur T. Vanderbilt.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 10.
For reversal — LLOYD, J. 1.