Opinion
No. 183P23
12-13-2023
Weijun LUO v. Ursula R. NEAL, Adam C. Neal, Sr.
Weijun Luo, For Weijun Luo. Andrew Thomas Cornelius, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Ursula R. Neal, et al. E. Garrison White, Attorney at Law, For Ursula R. Neal, et al.
From N.C. Court of Appeals (22-657); From Cabarrus (19CVD2700) Nineteen-A District
Weijun Luo, For Weijun Luo.
Andrew Thomas Cornelius, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Ursula R. Neal, et al.
E. Garrison White, Attorney at Law, For Ursula R. Neal, et al.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 25th of July 2023 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is
"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of December 2023."
The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 24th of August 2023 by Plaintiff:
"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of December 2023."
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st of November 2023 by Plaintiff to Correct Docket Entry:
"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of December 2023."