From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lunts v. Rochester City School District

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Nov 16, 2007
No. 07-CV-6272T (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2007)

Opinion

07-CV-6272T.

November 16, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiffs Ellen and Alexander Lunts have made a motion pursuant to rule 55(b)(1) and (2) for default judgment. A review of the docket indicates that there is no return of service filed with the Court with regard to the Rochester City School District, and there is otherwise no indication that the Rochester City School District has been served. The Clerk of the Court has not entered an entry of default. Plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment is denied.

It is plaintiffs' responsibility to ensure that service is made on the Rochester City School District. Plaintiffs suggest that the Court order service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). In order to avoid costs to the Plaintiffs, the Court encourages them to utilize Rule 4(d). The manner in which the Waiver of Service is used is set out clearly in Rule 4(d)(2). Plaintiffs time to effect service is hereby extended until December 31, 2007.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lunts v. Rochester City School District

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Nov 16, 2007
No. 07-CV-6272T (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Lunts v. Rochester City School District

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN LUNTS and ALEXANDER LUNTS, Plaintiffs, v. ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

No. 07-CV-6272T (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2007)