From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lunts v. Rochester City Sch. Dist.

U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 15, 2013
571 U.S. 953 (2013)

Summary

affirming district court's decision not to address claims by pro se litigant not raised in the complaint

Summary of this case from Wright v. Jewish Child Care Ass'n of N.Y.

Opinion

No. 13–171.

2013-10-15

Ellen LUNTS, et vir, petitioners, v. ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.


Case below, 515 Fed.Appx. 11.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Lunts v. Rochester City Sch. Dist.

U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 15, 2013
571 U.S. 953 (2013)

affirming district court's decision not to address claims by pro se litigant not raised in the complaint

Summary of this case from Wright v. Jewish Child Care Ass'n of N.Y.
Case details for

Lunts v. Rochester City Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:LUNTS, ELLEN, ET VIR v. ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Court:U.S. Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 15, 2013

Citations

571 U.S. 953 (2013)
134 S. Ct. 429
187 L. Ed. 2d 282
82 U.S.L.W. 3215

Citing Cases

Wright v. Jewish Child Care Ass'n of N.Y.

While this tenet is generally applied to parties represented by counsel, as Wright was at the filing of her…