Opinion
1:21CV523
12-15-2022
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
On September 1, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed with the Court and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. [Docs. #26, 27.] Plaintiff filed objections [Doc. #29] and Defendants filed a response to the objections [Doc. #30].
The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default [Doc. #7] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #9] is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claim for attorney's fees and DENIED as to Plaintiff's FOIA claim.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Production and for Sanctions Under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) [Doc. #15] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #20] is GRANTED.