From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lunger v. Hinckley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 23, 1991
572 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

following Taylor

Summary of this case from Swezy v. Bart-Swezy

Opinion

No. 90-3040.

January 23, 1991.

Petition for writ of mandamus-prohibition.

William L. Gardiner, III, of Patterson, Maloney Gardiner, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.


We sua sponte strike Betty Lunger as a named respondent.

The respondent concedes error. We grant the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition and quash the order of the trial court on the authority of Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lunger v. Hinckley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 23, 1991
572 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

following Taylor

Summary of this case from Swezy v. Bart-Swezy
Case details for

Lunger v. Hinckley

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE LUNGER, PETITIONER, v. THE HONORABLE HARRY G. HINCKLEY, JR.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 23, 1991

Citations

572 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Swezy v. Bart-Swezy

This court noted that a party's consent is required before a hearing can be referred to a general master,…