From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundy v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 10, 2018
257 So. 3d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Summary

holding that "a jail credit waiver must be specific, voluntary, and clear from the face of the record"

Summary of this case from Bowen v. State

Opinion

No. 4D18-2008

10-10-2018

Zeffery LUNDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Zeffery Lundy, Milton, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Zeffery Lundy, Milton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Zeffery Lundy appeals the circuit court's order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion for correction of jail credit. He contends that he is entitled to an additional 238 days of credit on his sentence for violation of probation.

Absent from his motion were the required allegations on whether he waived any county jail credit at the time of the sentencing and, if so, the number of days waived. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(c)(5). Instead of allowing appellant leave to amend to cure this deficiency, the trial court attached appellant's plea form and denied the motion on its merits. The court found appellant waived any claim to additional jail credit. However, a jail credit waiver must be specific, voluntary, and clear from the face of the record. See, e.g. , Wolter v. State , 219 So.3d 852, 853 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). The plea form here did not satisfy this requirement.

Because appellant's motion was facially insufficient, the circuit court should have stricken it and given appellant leave to amend within sixty days. See, e.g. , Lopez v. State , 248 So.3d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (citations omitted). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the circuit court to enter an order striking the motion as facially insufficient and granting appellant sixty days to amend it to provide the information specified in rule 3.801(c) and this opinion. Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Levine, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lundy v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 10, 2018
257 So. 3d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

holding that "a jail credit waiver must be specific, voluntary, and clear from the face of the record"

Summary of this case from Bowen v. State

holding that a jail credit waiver must be specific, voluntary, and clear from the face of the record

Summary of this case from Johnson v. State
Case details for

Lundy v. State

Case Details

Full title:ZEFFERY LUNDY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 10, 2018

Citations

257 So. 3d 566 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Perez v. State

, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the motion");…

Johnson v. State

"Although an accused may waive his entitlement to jail credit when entering a plea, the record must…