From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundy v. Mashburn

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 8, 2020
302 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-3350

07-08-2020

Arthur LUNDY, Petitioner, v. M. MASHBURN, Warden, Northwest Florida Reception Center, and Florida Commission on Offender Review, Respondents.

Arthur Lundy, pro se, Petitioner. Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondents.


Arthur Lundy, pro se, Petitioner.

Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition is denied on the merits.

Kelsey, M.K. Thomas, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lundy v. Mashburn

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 8, 2020
302 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Lundy v. Mashburn

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR LUNDY, Petitioner, v. M. MASHBURN, Warden, Northwest Florida…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jul 8, 2020

Citations

302 So. 3d 964 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)