From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundry v. State

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Mar 13, 2007
CASE NO. 06-3343-SAC (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 06-3343-SAC.

March 13, 2007


ORDER


This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed upon payment of the filing fee by an inmate of the Lansing Correctional Facility, Lansing, Kansas. Mr. Lundry seeks to challenge his convictions in March, 2002, in the Reno County District Court, Hutchinson, Kansas, of solicitation of murder in the second degree, and three counts of aggravated assault. He was sentenced to 78 months in prison.

On January 5, 2007, this court entered a Memorandum and Order in which it set forth facts indicating this action was not filed within the applicable statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1). Petitioner was given thirty (30) days to show cause why his Petition should not be dismissed as time-barred, and in particular to show his entitlement to equitable tolling. The time for response has passed, and Mr. Lundry has submitted no response or further pleadings to the court. The court finds this action must therefore be dismissed as time-barred for the reasons stated in its Memorandum and Order of January 5, 2007.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed as time barred under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1), and all relief is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lundry v. State

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Mar 13, 2007
CASE NO. 06-3343-SAC (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Lundry v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARLAND M. LUNDRY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF KANSAS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Mar 13, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 06-3343-SAC (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2007)