From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundeen v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 5, 2007
919 A.2d 561 (Del. 2007)

Summary

affirming denial of motion to amend the scheduling order under the good cause standard after appellants had moved the trial court to allow them to amend their expert's report more than six months after the deadline had passed and noting appellants' pervasive noncompliance with trial rules and practice

Summary of this case from Shaw v. Am. Friction, Inc. (In re Asbestos Litig.)

Opinion

No. 508, 2006.

March 5, 2007.

Appeal from the Superior CA 04C-03-200.


Decisions Without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lundeen v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 5, 2007
919 A.2d 561 (Del. 2007)

affirming denial of motion to amend the scheduling order under the good cause standard after appellants had moved the trial court to allow them to amend their expert's report more than six months after the deadline had passed and noting appellants' pervasive noncompliance with trial rules and practice

Summary of this case from Shaw v. Am. Friction, Inc. (In re Asbestos Litig.)
Case details for

Lundeen v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers

Case Details

Full title:Lundeen v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Mar 5, 2007

Citations

919 A.2d 561 (Del. 2007)

Citing Cases

Shaw v. Am. Friction, Inc. (In re Asbestos Litig.)

SeeMoses v. Drake , 109 A.3d 562, 566 (Del. 2015) (affirming denial of motion to amend the scheduling order…

Moses v. Drake

Good cause is likely to be found when the moving party has been generally diligent, the need for more time…