From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lund v. Datzman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 4, 2022
2:19-cv-02287-JAM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-02287-JAM-DMC

11-04-2022

ERIC LUND, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY DATZMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS HAI LUC AND WANONA IRELAND WITH PREJUDICE

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having received a joint stipulation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) from all parties to the above-entitled matter agreeing to dismiss Defendants HAI LUC and WANONA IRELAND from this matter with prejudice, and finding good cause therein;

It is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants HAI LUC and WANONA IRELAND are hereby dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled action.

2. As a final adjudication on the merits of the claim of tortious interference with a business contract, the dismissal of HAI LUC and WANONA IRELAND with prejudice will have res judicata effect, not only on the claim against the two individuals themselves, but also as to any vicarious liability stemming from this claim on the California Highway Patrol as the employer.


Summaries of

Lund v. Datzman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 4, 2022
2:19-cv-02287-JAM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Lund v. Datzman

Case Details

Full title:ERIC LUND, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY DATZMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 4, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-02287-JAM-DMC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2022)