From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LUND v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA ETC. RY. CO

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Sep 2, 1915
28 Cal.App. 324 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1565.

September 2, 1915.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Franklin A. Griffin, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

E. W. Camp, E. S. Pillsbury, H. D. Pillsbury, and Platt Kent, for Appellant.

H. W. Glensor, for Respondents.


The only point presented upon this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment of the court. Upon a careful examination of the record we find that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence in respect to those findings of which the appellant complains; and this being so, the findings of the trial court, and the judgment founded thereon, will not be disturbed upon appeal.

The judgment and order denying defendant's motion for a new trial are affirmed.


Summaries of

LUND v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA ETC. RY. CO

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Sep 2, 1915
28 Cal.App. 324 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)
Case details for

LUND v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA ETC. RY. CO

Case Details

Full title:HENRY LUND et al., Respondents, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Sep 2, 1915

Citations

28 Cal.App. 324 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)
152 P. 313