From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lunbery v. Hornbeak

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 30, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1279 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1279 GGH P.

January 30, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 22, 2007, petitioner filed a motion requesting the appointment of attorney Juliana Drous to represent her in these proceedings. On November 7, 2007, the court ordered the Office of the Federal Defender to inform the court whether appointment of Ms. Drous was appropriate.

On January 15, 2008, the Federal Defender filed a response to the November 7, 2007, order. Good cause appearing, the court has determined that the interest of justice require appointment of Juliana Drous to represent petitioner. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's October 9, 2007, motion for appointment of counsel is granted;

2. Juliana Drous is appointed to represent petitioner.


Summaries of

Lunbery v. Hornbeak

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 30, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1279 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Lunbery v. Hornbeak

Case Details

Full title:KRISTI LYN LUNBERY, Petitioner, v. TINA HORNBEAK, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 30, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1279 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2008)