From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luna v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2015
Case No. CV 13-7549-MMM (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-7549-MMM (GJS)

10-15-2015

ANDRES LARRY LUNA, Petitioner v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and all pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

Most of the matters set forth in the Objections were before the Magistrate Judge and were considered by her in connection with the Report. To the extent, as it appears, Petitioner claims that error occurred in the state habeas process, his arguments do not state a basis for issuing a stay, nor would they constitute a cognizable habeas claim in this action.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance (Docket No. 24) is DENIED. DATED: October 15, 2015

/s/_________

MARGARET M. MORROW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Luna v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 15, 2015
Case No. CV 13-7549-MMM (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Luna v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:ANDRES LARRY LUNA, Petitioner v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 15, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-7549-MMM (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2015)