From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luna v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0234 GEB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0234 GEB PAN P.

February 17, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file a response to petitioner's application.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer within forty-five days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus on Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney General.


Summaries of

Luna v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0234 GEB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Luna v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO SCOTT LUNA, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0234 GEB PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006)