Opinion
7275-23
08-22-2023
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge
On June 30, 2023, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the grounds that the petition was not filed within the time prescribed in the Internal Revenue Code. Although the Court directed petitioner to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioner failed to do so. The record establishes that the petition was not timely filed. See I.R.C. sections 6213(a) and 7502; Foster v. Commissioner, 445 F.2d 799 (10th Cir. 1971); Hallmark Research Collective v. Commissioner, No. 21284-21, 159 T.C. (Nov. 29, 2022).
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.