From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lumpkin v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 18, 1971
185 S.E.2d 770 (Ga. 1971)

Opinion

26830.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 9, 1971.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 18, 1971.

Rape. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Alverson.

Glenn Zell, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joel M. Feldman, Carter Goode, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Courtney Wilder Stanton, William F. Bartee, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.


This appeal arises from a conviction of rape and sentence to life imprisonment. Enumerated as error are the admission of evidence of another crime by the defendant and instructions to the jury relating to the defense of alibi. Held:

1. Under decisions exemplified by Anderson v. State, 222 Ga. 561 (3) ( 150 S.E.2d 638); Gunter v. State, 223 Ga. 290, 291 ( 154 S.E.2d 608), it was not error to admit evidence of the defendant having committed another rape within days of the rape for which he was on trial. In both instances the same method of operation was used, in both instances it was testified that the defendant pulled his automobile up along side his victim's automobile, used a sawed-off shotgun or rifle to intimidate his victim, drove the victim back to the vicinity where he originally accosted her and in each instance told the victim that he did not want "to hear about this" the next day. The fact that in one instance the defendant also robbed his victim would not make the evidence inadmissible, and the instructions of the court limiting such evidence to show state of mind, plan, motive or scheme of the accused, show no reversible error. Nor, even assuming, but not deciding, that the testimony of the victim of the rape whose testimony was admitted solely for the purpose of showing state of mind, etc., must be corroborated, was it error to admit such evidence, where, as in this case, her testimony was corroborated.

2. The instructions of the trial court on the subject of alibi complained of in the third and fourth enumerations of error show no reversible error. See Smith v. Hightower, 227 Ga. 144 ( 179 S.E.2d 242), and citations.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. Felton, J., concurs in the judgment only.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 9, 1971 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 18, 1971.


Summaries of

Lumpkin v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 18, 1971
185 S.E.2d 770 (Ga. 1971)
Case details for

Lumpkin v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUMPKIN v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 18, 1971

Citations

185 S.E.2d 770 (Ga. 1971)
185 S.E.2d 770

Citing Cases

Coley v. State

Similar Cases Considered by the Court. Miller v. State, 224 Ga. 627 ( 163 S.E.2d 730); Ford v. State, 227 Ga.…

Nooner v. State

]" Smith v. State, 91 Ga. App. 360 (1) ( 85 S.E.2d 623). See also Anderson v. State, 222 Ga. 561, 563 (3) (…