From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lumpkin v. Minev

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 3, 2022
3:22-cv-00211-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00211-MMD-CLB

11-03-2022

JOSEPH LUMPKIN, Plaintiff, v. M. MINEV, et al., Defendants.

AARON D. FORD ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSEPH LUMPKIN PRO SE JOHN C. DORAME, BAR NO. 10029 PLAINTIFF, PRO SE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTORNEYS FOR INTERESTED PARTY NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS


AARON D. FORD ATTORNEY GENERAL

JOSEPH LUMPKIN PRO SE

JOHN C. DORAME, BAR NO. 10029 PLAINTIFF, PRO SE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

ATTORNEYS FOR INTERESTED PARTY NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between Plaintiff, Joseph Lumpkin, pro se, and the Nevada Department of Corrections, Defendants Charles Daniels, Michael Minev, M.D., Candis Rambur (incorrectly named as C. Lucas), and Jessica Rambur (incorrectly named as J. Issacson), by and through counsel, Nevada Attorney General, Aaron D. Ford, and Deputy Attorney General, John C. Dorame, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), that this action should be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice by order of this Court.

This Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice is executed as part of an out-of-court settlement between the parties. Pursuant to the terms of the parties' settlement agreement, each party hereto shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs.


Summaries of

Lumpkin v. Minev

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 3, 2022
3:22-cv-00211-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Lumpkin v. Minev

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LUMPKIN, Plaintiff, v. M. MINEV, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00211-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)