Opinion
March, 1922.
Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Lummis v. Oakley State Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1922
201 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Summaries of
Lummis v. Oakley State Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1922
201 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for
Lummis v. Oakley State Bank
Case Details
Full title:SAMUEL H. LUMMIS, Appellant, v. OAKLEY STATE BANK, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1922
Citations
201 App. Div. 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)