From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lumberman's Bank v. Huston

U.S.
May 10, 1897
167 U.S. 203 (1897)

Opinion

No. 203.

Argued and Submitted April 21, 1897. Decided May 10, 1897

Mr. John J. Crawford for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Solicitor General for defendant in error.


Error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.


The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined in Twin City National Bank v. Nebeker, just decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment is

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE concurred in the result.


Summaries of

Lumberman's Bank v. Huston

U.S.
May 10, 1897
167 U.S. 203 (1897)
Case details for

Lumberman's Bank v. Huston

Case Details

Full title:LUMBERMAN'S BANK v . HUSTON

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 10, 1897

Citations

167 U.S. 203 (1897)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Thames

Complainant had the right to file the bill. 22 Cyc. 910; 127 Ala. 320, 28 So. 405; 133 Ala. 459, 32 So. 144,…

McClellan v. Carland

eirs seek to establish title to the property of a decedent the State is a necessary party, and can claim the…