From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lukoff v. Sussex Downs, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1987
131 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

June 1, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ryan, J.).


Ordered, that the judgment is modified, on the facts, by reducing the award to the plaintiffs to the principal sum of $20,200; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

The trial court properly considered the amount actually paid by the plaintiffs to replace the negligently installed cedar siding in ascertaining the amount recoverable, i.e., the fair and reasonable market price for correcting the defective installation (see, Bellizzi v Huntley Estates, 3 N.Y.2d 112; City School Dist. v McLane Constr. Co., 85 A.D.2d 749, lv denied 56 N.Y.2d 504; Ciminelli v Umland Bros., 236 App. Div. 154). The record, however, reveals that the sum of $20,200 represents the actual costs of the repairs since the contract between the plaintiff and the contractor who performed the repairs expressly excluded "stone work", for which the plaintiffs paid $3,000 and for which the defendant was not liable. The amount of the award is accordingly modified to the extent indicated. Niehoff, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lukoff v. Sussex Downs, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1987
131 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Lukoff v. Sussex Downs, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD LUKOFF et al., Respondents, v. SUSSEX DOWNS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1987

Citations

131 A.D.2d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
516 N.Y.S.2d 471

Citing Cases

Magnum Holdings, Inc. v. Eldan Constr. Corp.

Stated another way, the rule is thus; "the plaintiff is entitled to be compensated for the cost of completion…

Kaufman v. Le Curt Construction Corp.

We reject her contention that the trial court erred in rejecting her claimed "actual costs" as the measure of…