From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lukens v. Maul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 16, 2016
3:15-CV-00512-JE (D. Or. May. 16, 2016)

Opinion

3:15-CV-00512-JE

05-16-2016

TROY LUKENS, Plaintiff, v. LARA MAUL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#25) on April 6, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendant Jamiel Brown's Motion (#20) for Summary Judgment and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#25). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant Brown's Motion (#20) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 16th day of May, 2016.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lukens v. Maul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 16, 2016
3:15-CV-00512-JE (D. Or. May. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Lukens v. Maul

Case Details

Full title:TROY LUKENS, Plaintiff, v. LARA MAUL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 16, 2016

Citations

3:15-CV-00512-JE (D. Or. May. 16, 2016)