interpreting Sandin as establishing that "administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest"
Summary of this case from Sinegal v. TerrellNo. 95-8268.
May 13, 1996, October TERM, 1995.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 71 F. 3d 192.
interpreting Sandin as establishing that "administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest"
Summary of this case from Sinegal v. Terrellinterpreting Sandin as establishing that "administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest"
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. PrattFull title:LUKEN v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE…
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 13, 1996
A claim for a reduction in time-earning class status also fails to qualify for federal habeas relief because…
Yackel v. ThalerA claim for a reduction in time-earning class status also fails to qualify for federal habeas relief because…