From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luke v. Honeyford

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Aug 20, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

351 CAF 19-00956

08-20-2020

IN THE MATTER OF ANDREA LUKE AND ADAM LUKE, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v. VALERIE J. HONEYFORD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

JAMES S. HINMAN, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS. MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. ALISON BATES, VICTOR, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.


PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

JAMES S. HINMAN, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS.

MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

ALISON BATES, VICTOR, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (James A. Vazzana, J.), entered January 29, 2019 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Honeyford v Luke ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Aug. 20, 2020] [4th Dept 2020]).

Entered: August 20, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Luke v. Honeyford

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Aug 20, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Luke v. Honeyford

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANDREA LUKE AND ADAM LUKE, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 20, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)