From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lujan-Suarez v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2013
No. 11-72615 (9th Cir. Oct. 15, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-72615 Agency No. A090-526-353

10-15-2013

SAUL ALFREDO LUJAN-SUAREZ, a.k.a. Manuel Suarez-Suares, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Saul Alfredo Lujan-Suarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

Lujan-Suarez does not challenge the BIA's determination that he is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(C) due to his conviction for misconduct involving weapons under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3102. His removability on this basis limits our jurisdiction to constitutional claims and questions of law. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)-(D).

Lujan-Suarez's assertion that he has resided in the United States since childhood is not a sufficiently colorable claim to invoke our jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) ("To be colorable in this context, the [question of law] need not be substantial, but the claim must have some possible validity." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Lujan-Suarez v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2013
No. 11-72615 (9th Cir. Oct. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Lujan-Suarez v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:SAUL ALFREDO LUJAN-SUAREZ, a.k.a. Manuel Suarez-Suares, Petitioner, v…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 15, 2013

Citations

No. 11-72615 (9th Cir. Oct. 15, 2013)