Opinion
Civil Action 20-5832
07-22-2022
SANDRA LUGO, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant.
ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22), and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply (ECF No. 27) is DENIED as moot.
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”) (Counts I and II), Plaintiff's claims for national origin discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the PHRA (Counts III and IV), and Plaintiff's claim for false imprisonment (Count VIII). The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims for disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the PHRA and Plaintiff's claim for retaliation in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.