From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lugo v. Superintendent

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 18, 2022
Civil Action 20-2281 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-2281

10-18-2022

OSCAR LUGO, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, COAL TOWNSHIP, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

HARVEY BARTLE III, J.

AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2022, upon careful and independent consideration of the pleadings and available state court records, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED;

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of the procedural bases for this adjudication. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

Lugo v. Superintendent

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 18, 2022
Civil Action 20-2281 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Lugo v. Superintendent

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR LUGO, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, COAL TOWNSHIP, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 20-2281 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2022)

Citing Cases

Collins v. Oberlander

O'Sullivan, 526 U.S. at 845 (emphasis added). Cool v. Att'y Gen. of PA, No. 19-145, 2022 WL 1471015, at *6…