From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lugo v. Fisher

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:19-cv-00039-NE-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00039-NE-SAB (PC)

07-12-2021

KEITH ROBERT LUGO, Plaintiff, v. R. FISHER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER

(ECF No. 93)

Plaintiff Keith Robert Lugo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On July 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendants' answer. Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules provide for a reply to an answer, absent an order from the Court requiring one. Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a)(7). In this case, the Court did not order a reply to the answer.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs reply to Defendants' answer, filed July 9, 2021, is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lugo v. Fisher

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:19-cv-00039-NE-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Lugo v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:KEITH ROBERT LUGO, Plaintiff, v. R. FISHER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 12, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-00039-NE-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)