From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lugo v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 19, 2024
8:22-cv-01349-KES (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)

Opinion

8:22-cv-01349-KES

12-19-2024

DANELLA LUGO, PLAINTIFFS v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., DEFENDANTS.


JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANT(S)

Honorable Karen E. Scott, United States Magistrate Judge

This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Karen E. Scott, Magistrate Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its special verdict. (Dkt. 142.) Consistent with that verdict, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff(s): Danella Lugo ___ take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and that the defendant(s): Costco Wholesale Corp. ____recover of the plaintiff(s) its costs of action, taxed in the sum of $0.

Under Local Rule 54-2, prevailing parties have until 14 days after the entry of judgment to file an application to tax costs.


Summaries of

Lugo v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 19, 2024
8:22-cv-01349-KES (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Lugo v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DANELLA LUGO, PLAINTIFFS v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., DEFENDANTS.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 19, 2024

Citations

8:22-cv-01349-KES (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)