From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luger v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Dec 18, 2014
858 N.W.2d 652 (N.D. 2014)

Opinion

No. 20140106.

12-18-2014

Chad Lee LUGER, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.

Mark T. Blumer, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Allen M. Koppy, State's Attorney, Mandan, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.


Mark T. Blumer, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Allen M. Koppy, State's Attorney, Mandan, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Chad Lee Luger appeals a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief after pleading guilty to interference with a telephone during an emergency call and aggravated assault. Luger argued the district court erred in denying his petition after an evidentiary hearing because he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and the outcome would have been different had his attorney not failed to depose a witness or not advised him that he would receive a maximum sentence if he were to take the matter to trial. We conclude the district court did not err in determining Luger failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2]GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Luger v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Dec 18, 2014
858 N.W.2d 652 (N.D. 2014)
Case details for

Luger v. State

Case Details

Full title:Chad Lee LUGER, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Dec 18, 2014

Citations

858 N.W.2d 652 (N.D. 2014)