Summary
In Luft v. Flove (270 N.Y. 640), commenced prior to the enactment of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act, where "plaintiff had only employed in the operation of his business his wife and two adult sons who were not members of the defendant unions and who desired to continue in such employ unmolested by such unions or by the members thereof," this court held that an action such as the one here brought might be maintained and the defendants restrained from picketing his place of business on his refusal to employ members of the union.
Summary of this case from Boro Park Sanitary Live Poultry Market, Inc. v. HellerOpinion
Argued March 4, 1936
Decided March 20, 1936
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Lawrence Kovalsky and David Goldstein for appellant.
George A. Rosen for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ.