From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luedtke v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 3, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1128-P (W.D. La. Apr. 3, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1128-P

04-03-2017

JAMES D. LUEDTKE, Petitioner v. WARDEN, Respondent


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after a de novo review of the record including the objection filed by Petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the § 2241 petition is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, this 3rd day of April, 2017.

/s/ _________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Luedtke v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 3, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1128-P (W.D. La. Apr. 3, 2017)
Case details for

Luedtke v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:JAMES D. LUEDTKE, Petitioner v. WARDEN, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 3, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1128-P (W.D. La. Apr. 3, 2017)