LUDY v. SHERMAN

Full title: DARYL LUDY, Plaintiff, v. JAMES F. SHERMAN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 16, 2006

Civil Action No. 06-74 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-74 Erie.

August 16, 2006

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SEAN McLAUGHLIN, District Judge

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on Mrch 23, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14], filed on July 19, 2006, recommended that Plaintiff's application for emergency restraining order, included as part of his Complaint [Doc. No. 5] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the application and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16^th day of August, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's application for emergency restraining order included as part of his Complaint is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on July 19, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.