Opinion
Argued April 26, 1875
Decided May 25, 1875
Wm. W. Niles for the appellant.
B.F. Watson for the respondents.
MILLER, J., reads memorandum for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Argued April 26, 1875
Decided May 25, 1875
Wm. W. Niles for the appellant.
B.F. Watson for the respondents.
MILLER, J., reads memorandum for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Full title:EDWARD H. LUDLOW et al., Respondents, v . NATHANIEL DOLE, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 25, 1875
The question of partnership was not involved in the case. III. Under an allegation of a contract to pay a…
United States ex rel. Susi Contracting Co. v. Zara Contracting Co.Professor Williston points out that the measure of recovery by way of restitution, though often confused with…