Opinion
No. 8474.
Argued March 9 and 10, 1944.
Decided December 1, 1944.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for District of New Jersey; William F. Smith, Judge.
Leslie B. Young, of New York City (Joseph G. Young, of Newark, N.J., and Pennie, Davis, Marvin Edmonds, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
William S. Pritchard, of New York City (John W. Steward, of Paterson, N.J., Harry H. Levin, of New York City, and John W. Steward, of Paterson, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS, JONES, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.
After study of the briefs and the record in this case we see no occasion for further discussion of the valid reasons cogently and clearly set forth in the opinion of Judge Smith, 50 F. Supp. 395, for declaring the claims of the patent sub judice to be invalid. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.