From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ludlam v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1987
131 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

June 15, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The decision as to whether to direct an immediate trial where the only triable factual issue concerned damages was within the sound discretion of the trial court (CPLR 3212 [c]). Where, as here, there were still pending discovery proceedings and a pending motion to consolidate this action with another action — which motion has since been granted — the court's refusal to grant a trial preference was not an abuse of discretion. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ludlam v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1987
131 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Ludlam v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:PAULA LUDLAM, Appellant, v. RICHARD JONES et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1987

Citations

131 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)