From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ludgate v. Miller

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania
Sep 20, 1948
8 F.R.D. 364 (E.D. Pa. 1948)

Opinion

         Civil action by Albert Ludgate against E. Clarence Miller. On defendant's motion for leave to bring in McKenelm H. F. Rose as third party defendant.

         Decision in accordance with opinion.

          Felix & Felix, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

          J. B. H. Carter, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


          KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

         The plaintiff's objection is well taken, in view of the amendment to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 14(a), 28 U.S.C.A. The motion will be dismissed unless, within fifteen days, the defendant amends his third-party complaint by striking out the allegation of liability of Rose to the plaintiff and by stating whatever cause of action he, the defendant, may have against Rose.


Summaries of

Ludgate v. Miller

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania
Sep 20, 1948
8 F.R.D. 364 (E.D. Pa. 1948)
Case details for

Ludgate v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:LUDGATE v. MILLER et al.

Court:United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 20, 1948

Citations

8 F.R.D. 364 (E.D. Pa. 1948)