From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luczak v. Coakley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 16, 2018
No. 17-7583 (4th Cir. Mar. 16, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-7583

03-16-2018

MR. CASEY LUCZAK, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOE COAKLEY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Casey Luczak, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00086-GMG-RWT) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Casey Luczak, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Casey Luczak, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Luczak v. Coakley, No. 3:17-cv-00086-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Luczak v. Coakley

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 16, 2018
No. 17-7583 (4th Cir. Mar. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Luczak v. Coakley

Case Details

Full title:MR. CASEY LUCZAK, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOE COAKLEY, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 16, 2018

Citations

No. 17-7583 (4th Cir. Mar. 16, 2018)