From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucy v. Board of Trustees of University of Alabama

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 15, 1954
213 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 14857.

June 15, 1954.

Robert L. Carter, Constance Baker Motley, New York City, Arthur D. Shores, Birmingham, Ala., Thurgood Marshall, New York City, for appellants.

Frontis H. Moore, Andrew J. Thomas, Samuel H. Burr, Birmingham, Ala. (Burr, McKamy, Moore Tate, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for appellees.

Before HOLMES and STRUM, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, District Judge.


In the order appealed from, dismissing the complaint as to each of the defendants in this cause, the court below allowed the plaintiffs fifteen days within which to amend their complaint. It also allowed one of the defendants until October 27, 1953, to file objections to the application to substitute him as a party defendant for defendant Bidgood. The order appealed from was dated October 9, 1953, and the notice of appeal was filed October 27, 1953. There is nothing in the record to show that the plaintiffs did not amend their complaint within the fifteen days allowed them for that purpose, and there is nothing in the record to show that Oliver Cromwell Carmichael did not file objections to the application to substitute him as a party defendant for defendant Bidgood. Accordingly, the appeal was prematurely filed and should be dismissed for that reason. Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer Corporation, 2 Cir., 37 F.2d 14. It is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Lucy v. Board of Trustees of University of Alabama

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 15, 1954
213 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Lucy v. Board of Trustees of University of Alabama

Case Details

Full title:LUCY et al. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 1954

Citations

213 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

Anastasiadis v. S.S. Little John

The foregoing principle has been followed by this Court in various types of cases. Dade County, Fla. v.…